Monthly Archives: August 2011

Malaised & Confused

Written by . Filed under Reviews. Tagged , , , . 1 Comment.

Terri, the new film from Azazel Jacobs, who last directed the indie Momma’s Man, is a seriously great movie that serves up an ample antidote to contemporary films of the identity confused coming-of-age teen dramedy ilk. Actually, the first mistake is to label Terri a comedy when in spite of the humorous (albeit restrained) presence of John C. Reilly as Mr. Fitzgerald and the potentially goofy set-up of an obese student who raises the concern of his vice principal when he starts wearing pajamas to school everyday, the film is a probing character drama with doses of funny no more frequent than in real daily life. The character Terri (Jacob Wysocki) is ostracized at school for his weight and social ineptitude and he also has a difficult home life, but Precious this is not. He lives at home with his mentally troubled Uncle James; the absence of Terri’s parents is admirably left unexplained. For all this, Terri isn’t all that sad. He is, however, damn far from happy. Terri just is. His disposition is one of relentless apathy. Even his pajama habit isn’t some form of rebellion but as he honestly explains, they just fit him well.

Terri’s social life is mostly composed of vicarious experience. We see as he periodically observes an over-aggressive horny teen boy frequently attempt to coerce a girl named Heather into allowing him to explore her nether regions during home economics. It isn’t until Mr. Fitzgerald has reached out to Terri that he begins to break free of his passive behaviour and becomes able to participate with his environment and the people around him. Terri eventually witnesses the boy reach his goal with Heather, despite her persistent reluctance. Other students notice as well, humiliating the girl, who becomes a social outcast as a result. Terri’s first moral act comes when he interferes with Fitzgerald’s plans with kicking Heather out of school, assuring him that Heather was not really a willing participant and ultimately convincing him to let her stay. Soon after, Terri again socially intervenes when Heather is being singled out in class and he diverts the attention, rescuing her from further humiliation. The two alienated classmates then embark on a relationship, which begins with the film’s sweetest sequence: a beautiful ode to note-passing (the one high school activity yours truly excelled in). They exchange various smileys and one-line questions and answers. Thankfully, Terri doesn’t tread the territory of other films where the relationship is romanticized and unreasonably sentimental. The characters never really even sincerely connect on a deeper level than a vague mutual understanding of their respective pain.

The relationship between Fitzgerald and Terri is the emotional anchor of the film, and breaks away from the mold of similar teacher/mentor-student dynamics in movies. Often, Fitzgerald’s efforts to communicate are relatively unsuccessful and as we begin to realize the more we see him in conversation with Terri, he has his own fair share of problems. In fact, all the characters in the film are “screwed up”. Not in the “lets celebrate our screwed up-edness as just a sign of our diversity” way that the abysmal Boden/Fleck film from last year did, but in a real “these people have problems” way. The characters become endeared to us not out of contrived idiosyncratic caricaturing but from the mutual struggles they share. Their issues are serious and not afforded a solution, nor are they played down. On the contrary, the issues inherent in the three young leads (the as-of-yet unmentioned Chad is another troubled student receiving extra attention from Mr. Fitzgerald) and Reilly’s character all peak towards the end. Most notably, in what has to be one of the most uncomfortably drawn out sequences in a “high-school movie”, Terri, Heather and Chad all get drunk and pop Terri’s Uncle’s pills in a shed. Their insecurity and vulnerability overflows in an unflinching portrayal of confused adolescent sexuality. The shifting empathetic power of that scene is most impressive as each character is alternatively sad, dumb, and cruel. Heather transfers her sexual humiliation to Chad and pathetically throws herself at Terri, who in turn can only manage to cry. Still, the strongest part of the film lies in the evolution of the relationship between Terri and Fitzgerald which slowly shifts from principal-student to a non-institutionalized friendship.

The subtle politics of the film illuminate some of the cracks in the education system, and how it can fail students. Were it not for Fitzgerald stepping out of the normal bounds of his job, Terri would likely continue through high school completely alienated and confused. Fitzgerald isn’t the cool counselor who tries to be everyone’s “friend” and asks students to refer to him by his first name. His approach is sweet and frank and comes from genuine concern for troubled students. His humble effectiveness comes from his ability to actually relate to their situation. His relative success with Terri contradicts the fundamental rigidity of high school organization. Fitzgerald screws up as much as Terri, and after an incident in which he breached Terri’s trust, he admits as much in a powerful monologue that may mark the high point of Reilly’s career, while also being perhaps the most memorable scene in the film. It’s an inspiring, clumsy soliloquy that is no more articulate than the character saying it: a strong point of the film in that no character’s dialogue or actions reach beyond their limited ability to communicate. At the end of the film, which takes place on a Saturday morning, Terri and Mr. Fitzgerald re-enter the school but on their own terms, and in doing so transform the meaning of the space as well as the dimension of their relationship.

Terri is an unusually effective portrait of high school malaise. It proves more effective than the more clinical steps taken by Noah Baumbach with The Squid and the Whale and the cruel idiosyncratic caricatures of Todd Solondz. It aims not to pull heart strings like other films with similar subject matter and instead stares deeply at the core of adolescent alienation and offers not catharsis nor resolution but strives only to cope with it, much like the characters themselves, a success resulting from Jacobs’ ability to create an authentic realist aura. Deservedly, the film ends with a smile, and an image implying a sense of “growth”, but not with a simple, happy ending that provides absolute closure. Thankfully, the film sidesteps what I thought would be an all too obvious token of character change. Nope, Terri is still wearing pajamas as he exits the frame for the last time. Jacobs avoids such a gesture of conformity and Terri will have to continue struggling with being “different”, for better and for worse, for the rest of his life.

Images of the Week – The Birds

Written by . Filed under Images of the Week. Tagged , , , . No comments.

From Alfred Hitchcock’s The Birds (1963). The unrequited gazes of three homely, helpful men.

Images of the Week – Touch of Evil

Written by . Filed under Images of the Week. Tagged , , , , , , , . No comments.

From Orson Welles’ Touch of Evil (1958). “He’s [Menzies] looking out the window, as these two characters [Quinlan and Grandi] walk away, we get four images super imposed over each other, we have Menzies, lonely, in a sense, because Quinlan is walking away from him and then we have Susie, lonely, back in that motel and [we see] those two join together…The reflection gives us two images and [we get] a desert landscape over [the image of Menzies] and then [we get] another reflection as the blind raises.” –James Naremore, from the DVD commentary with Jonathan Rosenbaum

Sorry, No Food: Earliest Naruse

Written by . Filed under Reviews. Tagged , , , . No comments.

Before watching Mikio Naruse’s oldest surviving film, a silent short from 1931 titled Flunky, Work Hard, I had only seen the director’s most celebrated work, When a Woman Ascends the Stairs, which was made nearly thirty years later. I had dialed my expectations back quite a bit in preparation for what was likely to be a slight piece of work, in which the filmmaker was most likely merely figuring out the properties of his medium, and surely far from carving out his auteurist sensibilities. After all, the protagonist of this film is a husband and father, not a woman like with all of Naruse’s following films, so the social and human consciousness of his style may not be developed. Instead, as I discovered, the 28-minute-long Flunky (the abbreviated version available on DVD) was anything but minor.

The opening shots establish a divide of some sort between husband and wife. The protagonist, Okabe, an insurance salesman, is outside, cleaning his shoe, as we see the wife inside doing housework. As we discover the family is impoverished, it is their social inequity and financial struggle that Naruse portrays as the source of the issues explored in the film. The first sign of this is when Okabe’s young boy returns home complaining of being hit by another boy. As it turns out, Okabe’s son is actually to blame. He broke his friend’s toy plane and beat him up. The son having acted out because of his envy of the boy’s possession, something his family can not afford. The mother of the bullied child smugly suggests to Okabe’s wife that they should buy their son a toy every now and then, a demonstration of a social ignorance, a divide between neighbours.

Further evidence of the family’s strife, Okabe hides when the landlord comes to collect the rent. The scene is played out comically, with the landlord entering the home and Okabe accidentally falling out of the closet, but the light, comic notes of Flunky are just padding around the cold reality that permeates the film. The family is depending on a deal Okabe is attempting to close with a mother with five children, which would help enormously as she would buy insurance for each of them. Increasing the pressure, before he sets off to try to make it happen, Okabe knocks over the meal his wife is preparing (it goes without saying how precious even a single meal is to this lower class family), a moment punctuated by a sad close-up of a now emptied pan.

Upon arriving at the household of his potential client, Okabe encounters a rival salesman who is doing his best to close the very same deal. It is likely that this man is also a father and husband struggling to pay the rent and put food on the table. These two working class men who would otherwise have nothing against one another are pitted against each other. They shamelessly argue and exchange shoves in front of the woman, who refuses to deal with either of them and asks them to leave. This doesn’t stop them from vying for her approval. Okabe begins to insincerely play with her children in the yard (still, he is giving them more attention than we’ve seen him give his own son). Eventually both salesman fight again and are asked to leave once more.

After a spat with his son, after he was caught picking on other children again, Okabe visits the mother of the bullied boy, who tells him an unidentified child was hit by a train. Okabe unabashedly uses this as a segue into selling insurance: “you never know when tragedy might strike”. A sad irony as unbeknownst to Okabe, it was his son who was hit by the train. On his way home, using what seems to be almost if not all of the money Okabe has to his name, he buys his son the toy plane, regretful of the earlier fight and still unaware of the incident.

When Okabe finally discovers what happened, Naruse employs a fairly complicated experimental montage that consists of flashback images, fantasy images of Okabe happy with his son, super-imposed train tracks, effect shots (kaleidoscope, inverted black and white, etc.). Following this sequence, Okabe rushes to his son’s hospital bedside with his wife and the doctor tells them the boy’s fate is uncertain. More impressionable touches here: another experimental shot where Naruse super-imposes airplanes over the hospital room, and an insert shot of a fly drowning in the sink.

Flunky has a deceptively happy ending. The son miraculously wakes up and Okabe gives him his gift. It is happy only as the plot requires: the boy has his plane, the father has his son and their relationship is mended, husband and wife sit side by side smiling, overjoyed with their son’s survival. However, the divides and obstructions that Naruse has illustrated still exist, and will continue to oppress the family. One has to wonder, considering Okabe spent his money on his son’s toy, what will he say when, after they’ve celebrated, his wife turns to him and asks: “what’s for dinner tonight?”

Images of the Week – Election

Written by . Filed under Images of the Week. Tagged , , . No comments.

From Johnnie To’s Election (2005). In his film about the traditions of Hong Kong’s Triad society, in which a new chairman is elected democratically, To’s opening shot (following the opening credits) is that of Mahjong being played, itself a tradition, but more importantly: a game.

Of the two rival candidates, Big D (Tony Leung Ka Fai) isn’t willing to play by the rules and despite losing the election, he will not give up the leadership position without a fight. The rightful winner, Lam Lok (Simon Yam), seems straight up and honourable throughout, and eventually offers Big D a deal that temporarily satisfies him. At the end of the film, both men are fishing and Big D suggests they split the power in half. Then the calm, seemingly fair Lok murders him by way of boulder to the head.

He also murders Big D’s wife, who witnessed this happen.

The tradition is only a tidy cover-up of man’s far less democratic tendencies. Framed by the nature of the forest, To exposes the truth behind the charade of democracy.